COMPARE
Letter of intent versus term sheet
Both measured exhibits are letters on their face, so the difference is not the wrapper but the body: the letter of intent divides itself into a non-binding part and a binding part and names seven paragraphs that survive termination, while the term sheet is eighteen labelled rows that declare the character of the document in a single row.
This page describes a class of document in general terms. It is not legal advice, it is not about your situation, and it is not a substitute for the advice of an attorney. Reading it creates no attorney-client relationship.
Product status
OctoDoc-specific descriptions of proof files, public verification, read links, reading logs, AATL or B-LTA trust, and Object Lock on this page describe post-v1.0 designs, not capabilities in the current product. The cited standards and primary-source facts remain educational references.
01
The two forms
Both measured exhibits open as letters. The letter of intent carries a sender's address block, the date 8 June 2021, a named addressee at a street address, a subject line and a salutation naming the addressee. The term sheet carries an address block, the date 2 October 2017, the salutation "Dear ****," and one cover sentence: "Further to our discussions, we are pleased to present this ***** Binding Term Sheet for the acquisition of *****, subject to the conditions precedent listed below." The counterparty name is redacted with asterisks throughout the filed copy.
The bodies diverge. The letter of intent runs ten pages of numbered paragraphs of prose under two part headings, and ends with three signature blocks spread across its last two pages. The term sheet runs five pages of a two-column layout — eighteen capitalised labels down the left, EFFECTIVE DATE, BUYER, SELLER, CONTEMPLATED TRANSACTION, CONSIDERATION, TIMING and twelve more, each with a short block of text beside it — and ends with two signature lines printed side by side and no date lines at all.
Both sit at the same point in a transaction: after the commercial conversation, before the definitive agreement. For acquisitions to which 16 CFR 801.30 does not apply, the Hart-Scott-Rodino notification rules name three instruments at that point in one phrase, requiring "an affidavit attesting that a contract, agreement in principle, or letter of intent to merge or acquire has been executed, and further attesting to the good faith intention of the person filing notification to complete the transaction", and then treat that instrument as distinct from the definitive agreement it precedes.
OctoDoc, the signing system of record, treats either of them as one file, and what carries into the record is not the layout but where the binding half of the text sits and which parties are bound by it. This page describes a class of instrument in general terms and is not a substitute for the advice of an attorney.
02
Where each measured exhibit puts each provision
| Provision | Letter of intent exhibit (2021) | Term sheet exhibit (2017) |
|---|---|---|
| The split itself | Two part headings, PART ONE—NONBINDING PROVISIONS and PART TWO—BINDING PROVISIONS | One row, BINDING AND EXCLUSIVE, stating the character of the whole document |
| Confidentiality | Inside Paragraph 4, ACCESS, in the binding part; not named in the survival list | Row 18, NO-SHOP/CONFIDENTIALITY, plus one line in each of the two lists inside the COVENANTS row |
| Exclusivity, no-shop | Paragraph 5, EXCLUSIVE DEALING, binding part, running with the 60-day term | Two rows: BINDING AND EXCLUSIVE to a named date, and NO-SHOP/CONFIDENTIALITY for 90 days |
| Expenses | Paragraph 9, COSTS, binding part, named in the survival list | No expenses row |
| Governing law, jurisdiction, venue | Paragraph 15, naming New York, named in the survival list | Row 14, JURISDICTION, value "[TBD]" |
| Price and consideration | Paragraph 2 of the binding part, BASIC TRANSACTION | Row 5, CONSIDERATION, three numbered items |
| Conditions to closing | Paragraph 5 of the non-binding part, lettered (a) to (h) | Row 12, CONDITIONS PRECEDENT, numbered 1 to 3 |
| Representations and warranties | Paragraphs 4 and 5(g) of the non-binding part, "customary to a transaction of this nature" | Row 15, described as customary for transactions of this type, with an enumerated list |
| Conduct of business before closing | Paragraph 7, binding part, restraining three named acts | Rows 16 and 17, COVENANTS and NEGATIVE COVENANTS |
| Break-up payment | Paragraph 6, 10% of the consideration on a breach of exclusivity, named in the survival list | No break-up row |
| Termination and survival | Paragraph 11, naming seven paragraphs that survive | Expiry on a named date; nothing named as surviving |
03
The two exhibits, measured
- LOI exhibit
- DarkPulse, Inc. EX-10.4, filed 2021-11-15
- LOI pages
- 10
- LOI non-binding numbered paragraphs
- 5
- LOI binding numbered paragraphs
- 15
- LOI binding part begins
- Page 3 of 10
- LOI exclusivity paragraph begins
- Page 5 of 10
- LOI survival list
- Paragraphs 1, 5, 6, 8, 9, 14, 15 — on page 8 of 10
- LOI parties
- 3 — Purchaser, Company, Shareholder
- LOI marks
- 5 — 3 signature, 2 date
- LOI stated term
- 60 days from the effective date
- Term sheet exhibit
- Spindle, Inc. EX-10.1, filed 2017-10-04
- Term sheet pages
- 5
- Term sheet labelled rows
- 18
- Term sheet binding statement
- Row 7 of 18, headed BINDING AND EXCLUSIVE, opening page 2 of 5
- Term sheet no-shop row
- Row 18 of 18, closing page 4 of 5, 90 days from acceptance
- Term sheet parties
- 2 — Buyer, Seller
- Term sheet marks
- 2 — 2 signature, 0 date
04
Party sets, routing and signing order
The party sets are shaped differently. The measured letter of intent binds three parties — an acquiring corporation, the target company and an individual shareholder — and one human signs twice, once as chief executive of the company and once in a personal capacity. The measured term sheet binds two, a buyer and a seller, each with one officer signature.
The letter of intent prints a sequence. Its closing paragraph asks the addressee to sign and return a copy; the purchaser's block sits on page nine and the addressee's on page ten, under the heading "Acknowledged as to the Nonbinding and agreed as to the Binding Provisions". The term sheet prints two signature lines side by side on its final page with no return instruction and no date lines, so nothing on its face fixes an order. Across the pair the routing is mixed rather than uniformly sequential.
Neither form is signed before the other; they are alternative instruments for the same stage. What the record does show is re-execution within a form. Paragraph 3(d) of the measured letter of intent states that its own execution terminates a previous letter of intent between two of the same parties, executed five days earlier on 3 June 2021.
05
Clauses present in one exhibit and absent from the other
- 1Break-up payment of 10% of the consideration in an alternative transaction, triggered by a breach of the exclusivity paragraph — in the letter of intent, absent from the term sheet
- 2Right of first refusal exercisable within five business days of notice of a competing proposal — in the letter of intent, absent from the term sheet
- 3Termination clause with a survival list naming seven paragraphs by number — in the letter of intent; the term sheet states an expiry date and names nothing as surviving
- 4Costs and expenses, each party bearing its own — in the letter of intent, absent from the term sheet
- 5Entire agreement, amendment and assignment — in the letter of intent, absent from the term sheet
- 6A named governing law and venue — the letter of intent names New York; the term sheet carries a JURISDICTION row whose value is left as "[TBD]"
- 7Escrow of a certificate for 100,000 unregistered shares with a transfer agent, released to the seller if the definitive agreements are not concluded by a named date — in the term sheet, absent from the letter of intent
- 8An enumerated list of the five definitive agreements to be drawn, named one by one — in the term sheet; the letter of intent refers throughout to a single Definitive Agreement
- 9Named post-closing officer roles, two-year employment agreements and key-man insurance — in the term sheet, absent from the letter of intent
- 10An affirmative publicity obligation with a deadline — a press release and an SEC filing within four business days of execution — in the term sheet; the letter of intent's disclosure paragraph runs the other way, restricting public comment
06
The failure mode: a split that is not on the face of the file
The failure mode for this pair is a file whose binding and non-binding halves are not separated on its own face. Both measured exhibits do separate them, by different devices. The letter uses two part headings and a termination paragraph naming which paragraphs survive: "Upon termination of the Binding Provisions, the parties shall have no further obligations hereunder, except as stated in Paragraphs 1, 5, 6, 8, 9, 14, and 15 of these Binding Provisions, which shall survive any such termination." The term sheet uses one labelled row carrying a single sentence: "This document is meant to have the character of a binding term sheet which will be formalized in Definitive Agreements on or around December 31, 2017." A 2026 press release filed as an 8-K exhibit describes a third instrument at the same stage as drawing the line by naming its exceptions: "The MOU remains non-binding, except with respect to certain customary provisions, including exclusivity (no-shop), confidentiality, and expense allocation, and supersedes the prior memorandum of understanding dated January 22, 2026, as amended."
Where no such device is present, the division has to be reconstructed from prose, and the sealed record shows assent to the whole file with no marker of which half the parties treated as operative. A record cannot supply a distinction the document never drew.
Position varies inside each form. In the ten-page letter the binding part opens on page three, but its exclusivity paragraph does not begin until page five and its survival list not until page eight — five pages after the heading that governs them. On the five-page term sheet the row declaring the character of the document opens page two, while the no-shop row carrying the ninety-day restraint is the last of the eighteen and closes page four.
07
What OctoDoc does with a file of this shape
A file of either form is dropped in and the counter proposes the party set, the roles, the routing order and the marks on one confirm screen. Nothing is bound until a human confirms it, so a three-party letter of intent carrying five marks and a two-party term sheet carrying two are prepared the same way and reviewed once rather than dragged field by field.
The Margin answers a question about the file and resolves the answer to a page and a rectangle. A question about which paragraphs survive termination lands on the sentence that lists them, not on a paraphrase of it, and the citation is a coordinate in the file rather than a claim about it.
A post-v1.0 read-link design would produce a reading log with per-page reading data, which could be useful on a ten-page letter whose survival list does not appear until page eight. A proof file and no-account public verification are also post-v1.0 designs.
The software records what a document says and where it says it. It does not classify a provision as binding or non-binding, and it does not tell a party what the split in a particular file means for them.
SOURCES
Where each figure came from
1. “Upon termination of the Binding Provisions, the parties shall have no further obligations hereunder, except as stated in Paragraphs 1, 5, 6, 8, 9, 14, and 15 of these Binding Provisions, which shall survive any such termination.”
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, EDGAR · https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/866439/000168316821005721/darkpulse_ex1004.htm · checked 2026-07-27
2. “comprehensive representations, warranties, indemnities, conditions and agreements by the parties customary to a transaction of this nature”
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, EDGAR · https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/866439/000168316821005721/darkpulse_ex1004.htm · checked 2026-07-27
3. “Further to our discussions, we are pleased to present this ***** Binding Term Sheet for the acquisition of *****, subject to the conditions precedent listed below.”
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, EDGAR · https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1403802/000139390517000297/spdl_ex101.htm · checked 2026-07-27
4. “This document is meant to have the character of a binding term sheet which will be formalized in Definitive Agreements on or around December 31, 2017.”
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, EDGAR · https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1403802/000139390517000297/spdl_ex101.htm · checked 2026-07-27
5. “The MOU remains non-binding, except with respect to certain customary provisions, including exclusivity (no-shop), confidentiality, and expense allocation, and supersedes the prior memorandum of understanding dated January 22, 2026, as amended.”
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, EDGAR · https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1868419/000186841926000022/exhibit992apr212026.htm · checked 2026-07-27
6. “the notification required by the act shall contain an affidavit attesting that a contract, agreement in principle, or letter of intent to merge or acquire has been executed, and further attesting to the good faith intention of the person filing notification to complete the transaction.”
Office of the Federal Register, eCFR, 16 CFR 803.5(b) · https://www.ecfr.gov/api/versioner/v1/full/2026-07-01/title-16.xml?part=803§ion=803.5 · checked 2026-07-27
7. “If the executed agreement is not the definitive agreement, the affidavit must attest that a dated document that provides sufficient detail about the scope of the entire transaction that the parties intend to consummate has also been submitted.”
Office of the Federal Register, eCFR, 16 CFR 803.5(b) · https://www.ecfr.gov/api/versioner/v1/full/2026-07-01/title-16.xml?part=803§ion=803.5 · checked 2026-07-27
NEXT
OctoDoc, the signing system of record
Nobody wants to read the contract. OctoDoc is being built so you do not have to: write a document from a prompt, ask plain-language questions about the one you were sent, and keep every one of them in a single place instead of four accounts and an inbox.
Anyone can check a sealed file with no account.
Unlimited human sends on the paid tier.